NEW YORK (AP) 鈥� pleaded guilty Tuesday to paying millions of dollars to keep a plant operational in Syria 鈥� at a time when the militant group was 鈥� and agreed to pay roughly $778 million in penalties.
The Justice Department accused the company of turning a blind eye to the conduct of the Islamic State, negotiating a revenue-sharing agreement with the militant group as it was acquiring new territory and as Syria was mired in a brutal civil war. The company's actions, already investigated by French law enforcement authorities, occurred before to form the world鈥檚 largest cement maker.
Justice Department officials described it as the first case in which a company has pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization. Lafarge and a long-defunct Syrian subsidiary entered the plea in federal court in Brooklyn, agreeing to criminal fines of $90.78 million and a forfeiture of $687 million.
鈥淭here is no justification 鈥� none 鈥� for a multi-national corporation authorizing payments to a designated terrorist group. Such payments are egregious violations of our laws, justify maximum scrutiny by U.S. authorities, and warrant severe punishment,鈥� said Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen, the Justice Department鈥檚 top national security official.
Prosecutors say the company paid through intermediaries nearly $6 million to IS and al-Nusrah Front, another militant group, in 2013 and 2014. The fixed monthly payments weren't because of the company's ideological alignment with the groups, the Justice Department said, but made purely in pursuit of an economic advantage.
The company had constructed a $680 million plant in northern Syria in 2011, and facing competition from cheaper cement imported from Turkey, regarded the payments to IS as a way to ensure the continued operations of the plant and to protect its employees and the transport of raw materials into the facility.
The Justice Department accused the company of using fake contracts and falsified invoices to hide the partnerships, and of committing to a revenue-sharing agreement with IS in hopes that it would incentivize the group to protect the company's interests.
In one message, a company executive told colleagues that 鈥渨e have to maintain the principle that we are ready to share the 'cake,' if there is a cake.'鈥�
And after Lafarge evacuated the plant in September 2014, IS took possession of the cement that the company had produced and sold it at prices that would have yielded the group about $3.21 million, prosecutors say.
The payments came at a time when other companies were pulling operations out of the region and at a time when made clear to the world the Islamic State鈥檚 barbaric actions.
Charging documents, for instance, quote an Aug. 20, 2014, email exchange in which company officials describe their negotiations with IS, with one talking about the need to check with a company lawyer about 鈥渢he consequences of this kind of deal.鈥� One day earlier, IS had released a grisly video of the murder of freelance American journalist James Foley.
"Make no mistake: Lafarge and its leadership had every reason to know exactly with whom they were dealing 鈥� and they didn鈥檛 flinch," Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said Tuesday.
鈥淚nstead," she added, "Lafarge forged ahead, working with ISIS to keep operations open, undercut competitors, and maximize revenue. And all the while, through their support and funding, Lafarge enabled the operations of a brutal terrorist organization.鈥�
The allegations involve by authorities in France. Lafarge had previously acknowledged in 2013 and 2014 to guarantee safe passage for employees and supply its plant.
In 2014, the company was handed preliminary charges including financing a terrorist enterprise and complicity in crimes against humanity.
A French court later quashed the charges involving crimes against humanity but said other charges would be considered over payments made to armed forces in Syria.
That ruling was later overturned by France鈥檚 supreme court, leading another French court earlier this year to state that Lafarge must face charges of complicity in crimes against humanity.
No date for a trial of Lafarge and eight of its executives has been set yet in France.
The wrongdoing precedes Lafarge鈥檚 merger with Holcim in 2015, though the Justice Department said the transaction was completed without a thorough examination of Lafarge's past activities in Syria.
In a statement, Holcim said that when it learned of the allegations from the news media in 2016, it voluntarily conducted an investigation and disclosed the findings publicly. It fired the former Lafarge executives who were involved in the payments.
鈥淣one of the conduct involved Holcim, which has never operated in Syria, or any Lafarge operations or employees in the United States, and it is in stark contrast with everything that Holcim stands for," the company said. 鈥淭he DOJ noted that former Lafarge SA and LCS executives involved in the conduct concealed it from Holcim before and after Holcim acquired Lafarge SA, as well as from external auditors.鈥�
Lafarge said in its own statement that it has 鈥渁ccepted responsibility for the actions of the individual executives involved.鈥� It added: We deeply regret that this conduct occurred and have worked with the U.S. Department of Justice to resolve this matter.鈥�
It said the 鈥渃onduct occurred during a period of intense violence and coercive pressure from terrorist groups,鈥� as the company 鈥渢ried to manage the grave security challenges in the area surrounding its cement plant during the Syrian civil war.鈥�
The Islamic State group is abbreviated as IS and has been referred to as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS.
___
Tucker reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Sylvie Corbet in Paris contributed to this report.
Eric Tucker And Bobby Caina Calvan, The Associated Press
