VANCOUVER 鈥� A British Columbia Supreme Court judge ruling on a First Nations land title lawsuit says it did not prove it had rights to its entire claim area, although he suggested it may be time for the provincial government to rethink its current test for such titles.聽
The Nuchatlaht First Nation, a community on Vancouver Island's northwest coast, wanted title over an area of Crown land that included a portion of Nootka Island and much of the surrounding coastline.
Justice Elliott Myers said in his decision issued Thursday that there "may be areas" the nation can establish in its claim, but if it wants to do that another hearing would be required.
"I stress that I am not prejudging any of the issues or whether a pleading amendment would be necessary," he said in the decision. "I am merely leaving it open to the plaintiff to come back before me to canvass these issues should it wish to do so."
He's given the nation 14 days to decide if it wishes to proceed on the further claims.聽
The nation said in a statement issued Friday that it was celebrating the judge's finding that it has Aboriginal title within its territory, while it's disappointed it has been asked to return to court to identify just where that title is.聽
"Nuchatlaht were victorious on nearly every point at issue in the trial, pushing the state of the law forward," the statement said. 聽
It said it would return to the court to identify the locations of its title and will apply to the B.C. Court of Appeal over the decision to deny awarding the entire claim area.聽
鈥淲e need to take this victory and continue fighting for recognition of our rights," Nuchatlaht Councillor Mellissa Jack said in the statement.聽
The court heard the Nuchatlaht moved to a village on Nootka Island in the 1780s and they say they occupied the area in 1846, when the Crown resolved boundary disputes with the United States and claimed sovereignty over what is now British Columbia.聽
However, the province denies the Nuchatlaht occupied all of the territory it was claiming.聽
In the lawsuit filed in 2017, the nation argued that the B.C. and federal governments denied Nuchatlaht rights by authorizing logging and "effectively dispossessing" the nation of territory.
The B.C. government said the Nuchatlaht did not hold Aboriginal title over the entire 230-square-kilometre area, and said it has met its obligations under agreements with the nation related to forest resources.
Myers said in his decision that the case demonstrates "the peculiar difficulties of a coastal Aboriginal group meeting the current test for Aboriginal title, given the marine orientation of the culture."聽
For example, he said it is difficult to prove the nation had used the land because they primarily travelled by canoe, so there were no established trails between coastal locations.
He wrote that this case may be indicative of the need for a "reconsideration of the test for Aboriginal title as it relates to coastal First Nations."聽
"That would be for a higher court to determine," the decision said.
Premier David Eby said the province is looking at the decision to determine "how to move forward from it."聽
"Our relationship with coastal First Nations remains critically important as we work together in partnership," he told an unrelated news conference Friday.聽
"At this point, we've only just received (the ruling), but we know our work has to continue with Indigenous people, and in particular with coastal First Nations going forward."
The land claim was the first to be heard since B.C. passed legislation in 2019 to align its laws with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
It was also the first case since the landmark 2014 Tsilhqot鈥檌n Aboriginal title decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, which recognized the Tsilhqot鈥檌n Nation鈥檚 rights and title over a swath of its traditional territory in B.C.鈥檚 central Interior, not only to historic village sites.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 12, 2023.
Brieanna Charlebois, The Canadian Press
