The Nebraska Supreme Court ruled Friday that competing measures that would expand or limit abortion rights can appear on the November ballot.
The high court鈥檚 ruling came days after it heard arguments in three lawsuits that sought to keep one or both of the competing abortion initiatives off the November ballot.
Organizers for each measure more than 200,000 signatures, which was well over the 123,000 required valid ones needed to get them on the ballot.
An organizer for the measure to expand abortion rights called the decision a 鈥渧ictory for all Nebraskans.鈥�
鈥淎nti-abortion politicians forced an abortion ban into law and then coordinated with activists to launch desperate lawsuits to silence over 200,000 Nebraskans by preventing them from voting on what happens to their bodies,鈥� said Allie Berry, campaign manager for Protect Our Rights. 鈥淭hey know Nebraskans want to end the harmful abortion ban and stop government overreach in their personal and private healthcare decisions. Today, their plans failed.鈥�
Matt Heffron, an attorney with the conservative Thomas More Society, which challenged the measure to expand abortion rights, called the court's ruling 鈥渄eeply concerning鈥� and said the group fears that if the measure passes, it would lead to unnecessary abortions in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
A report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that in 2021, less than 1% of abortions occurred after 21 weeks of gestation.
One initiative would enshrine in the Nebraska Constitution the right to have an abortion until viability, or later to protect the health of the pregnant woman. The other would enshrine in the constitution Nebraska鈥檚 current 12-week abortion ban, passed by the Legislature in 2023, which includes exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the pregnant woman.
Two lawsuits 鈥� one brought by an Omaha resident and the other by a Nebraska neonatologist who both oppose abortion 鈥� argued that the measure seeking to expand abortion rights violates the state鈥檚 prohibition against addressing more than one subject in a bill or ballot proposal. They said the ballot measure deals with abortion rights until viability, abortion rights after viability to protect a woman鈥檚 health, and whether the state should be allowed to regulate abortion, amounting to three separate issues.
鈥淭he fact that the drafters of the Initiative have made certain choices regarding the specific limits, parameters, and definitions does not mean that each such provision is a separate subject,鈥� Justice Lindsey Miller-Lerman wrote for the court in its unanimous decision.
A similar on an abortion rights ballot measure before the conservative Florida Supreme Court earlier this year 鈥� a development cited in the Nebraska decision.
鈥淲e note that our decision in this case aligns with a decision of the Florida Supreme Court issued earlier this year,鈥� Friday鈥檚 opinion reads.
A third lawsuit challenged the 12-week ban ballot measure. It argued that if the high court found that the abortion rights measure fails the single-subject test, it also had to find that the 12-week ban initiative failed it. The abortion restriction measure would loop in at least six separate subjects 鈥� from regulating abortion to listing exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother, an attorney for that third lawsuit argued.
The state鈥檚 high court has offered a mixed bag on single-subject law challenges. In 2020, the Nebraska Supreme Court seeking to legalize medical marijuana after finding that its provisions to allow people to use marijuana and to produce it were separate subjects that violated the state鈥檚 single-subject rule.
But in July, the court ruled that a passed by the Legislature in 2023 combining the 12-week abortion ban with another measure to limit gender-affirming health care for minors . That led to a scathing dissent by Justice Lindsey Miller-Lerman, who accused the majority of applying different standards to bills passed by the Legislature and those sought by voter referendum.
The court agreed to expedite its hearings and rulings on the lawsuits to eliminate the need for any proceedings at lower courts and to get the issue decided before ballots are printed across the state. The deadline to certify the Nebraska November ballot is Friday.
Nebraska will be the first state to carry competing abortion amendments on the same ballot since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022, effectively ending 50 years of national abortion rights and making abortion a state-by-state issue. But the topic of abortion in general will be on the ballot in nine states across the country this year. Measures to protect access have also qualified to go before voters in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nevada and South Dakota.
New York also has a ballot measure that proponents say would protect abortion rights, though there鈥檚 a dispute about its impact. A measure is not on the Arkansas ballot, but an attempt to add it is being sought through litigation.
In Nebraska, voters could end up approving both competing abortion ballot measures. But because they鈥檙e competing and therefore cannot both be enshrined in the constitution, the one that gets the most 鈥渇or鈥� votes would be the one adopted, the secretary of state's office has said. Voters in since the have favored abortion rights.
Most Republican-controlled states have implemented abortion bans of some sort since Roe was overturned.
Public opinion polling has also shown growing support for abortion rights, including a recent that found 6 in 10 Americans think their state should allow someone to obtain a legal abortion if they don鈥檛 want to be pregnant for any reason.
Fourteen states currently have bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with some exceptions; four states ban it after about six weeks, which is before many women know they are pregnant. Nebraska and North Carolina are the only states that have opted for bans that kick in after 12 weeks of pregnancy.
Margery A. Beck, The Associated Press
