BOSTON (AP) 鈥� Drivers for ride-hailing companies in Massachusetts are pushing ahead with what they describe as a first-of-its-kind ballot question that could win them union rights if approved.
The push comes despite last month guaranteeing that Uber and Lyft drivers will earn a minimum pay standard of $32.50 per hour in Massachusetts.
Supporters of the measure last week delivered the final batch of signatures needed to land a spot on the November ballot.
April Verrett, president of the Service Employees International Union, said the tens of thousands of Uber and Lyft drivers working in Massachusetts deserve the collective bargaining benefits of unions.
鈥淭his would be the first in the nation to establish a union for drivers in this way,鈥� she said. The group is working on a similar effort in California.
Attorney General Andrea Campbell, who secured the settlement 鈥� which included what she described as 鈥渁n unprecedented package of minimum wage, benefits and protections鈥� 鈥� is also backing the ballot question.
鈥淚t鈥檚 a strong foundation that can and should be built upon,鈥� Campbell, a Democrat, said of the settlement.
Verrett said labor laws in the country aren't written to take into consideration gig workers, something the ballot question would begin to remedy in Massachusetts if voters support the question 鈥� and drivers ultimately form a union.
鈥淲e fundamentally believe that workers are workers,鈥� she said. 鈥淎ll workers deserve a union, a way to come together with their coworkers to have a say in their livelihood.鈥�
Yolanda Rodriguez has driven for Lyft for about six years and says she鈥檚 convinced that having union rights would benefit her and other drivers.
The 33-year mother of three who lives in Malden, just outside Boston, said she begins most days at about 3 a.m., with many of her trips involving driving people to Logan International Airport.
Rodriguez said about a year ago her account was canceled when she was pregnant. She said she went for five months before it was restored and she could begin earning an income again.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 want that to happen to other women or men because there are often children behind the cancellations,鈥� she said through a translator. 鈥淚f I had a union, I would be able to turn to them and work with them.鈥�
Under a policy Lyft announced earlier this year, the company said their goal is to make drivers feel supported and respected when a temporary hold is placed on a driver鈥檚 account during an investigation 鈥� including a streamlined, in-app button for drivers to appeal deactivation decisions.
But not everyone thinks the question goes far enough 鈥� if they support it at all.
Henry De Groot, 28, of Boston, has driven for both companies on and off for five years but says the ballot proposal question isn鈥檛 a fair deal.
鈥淚鈥檓 100 percent pro-union and I鈥檓 100 percent opposed to the ballot question,鈥� he said.
De Groot said the question doesn鈥檛 create a democratic system where all drivers have rights. He said no rights are included in the initiative beyond basic collective bargaining, including details on how dues are spent.
鈥淵ou can鈥檛 have a regular union and not let workers have a vote,鈥� he said. 鈥淭here is no driver control over leadership. It鈥檚 about the basic democratic rights that other unions have. It鈥檚 a top-down organization.鈥�
Kelly Cobb-Lemire, an organizer with Massachusetts Drivers United, which she describes as a grassroots, driver-led campaign, said other app-based workers including delivery drivers are left out of the ballot question.
鈥淲e鈥檙e fighting to ensure that both drivers and delivery workers have the right to form a union and are classified as workers,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e support democratic collective bargaining where every driver has a vote.鈥�
She said her group is instead pushing lawmakers to approve a bill that would enshrine full employee rights for all app workers and include a path to unionization for everyone. She said the legislation also would mandate that drivers and delivery workers be paid at least the Massachusetts minimum wage for all working time.
The ballot question, if approved, would define 鈥渁ctive drivers鈥� as those who completed more than the median number of rides in the previous six months.
Once a union signs up 5% of active drivers in a bargaining unit, it would get a list of all eligible workers and block any other union from being recognized without an election.
If a union then signs up 25% of the eligible voters in a bargaining unit, it becomes the certified bargaining representative unless another union or a 鈥渘o-union鈥� group comes forward within the next seven days with signed cards from at least 25% of eligible voters, at which point there would be an election.
Backers of the question had been preparing to go up against a possible series of industry-backed ballot questions that intended to classify drivers .
But that threat evaporated after the settlement, which barred the companies from supporting all five proposed variations of their ballot question 鈥� meaning they won't proceed to the ballot.
In a statement after the settlement was announced, Lyft said the deal resolved a lawsuit that recently went to trial and avoided the need for the ballot initiative campaign this November.
Uber also released a statement at the time calling the agreement 鈥渁n example of what independent, flexible work with dignity should look like in the 21st century.鈥�
Under the agreement, drivers will earn one hour of sick day pay for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 40 hours per year under the deal.
The two companies will also be required to pay a combined $175 million to the state to resolve allegations that the companies violated Massachusetts wage and hour laws, a substantial majority of which will be distributed to current and former drivers.
___
This story corrects the spelling of the Service Employees International Union president's name. It is April Verrett, not April Verritt.
Steve Leblanc, The Associated Press
